Saturday, July 04, 2009

4th of July

On the occasion of the 233rd anniversary of the adoption of the "Declaration of Independence" by the Second Continental Congress of the United States of America, I would like to congratulate my American brethren. The founding fathers of the original thirteen colonies were farsighted and precise against what they were fighting for, and who they were fighting against. Their views, are brought froth quite emphatically in the document, and one can clearly see the imprints of the great Thomas Jefferson, who was the primary author of the declaration.

The document, however "perfect" in its aims and objectives, was delivered by humans for the benefit of humans. It could therefore be argued that while its goal was of perfection, its implementation leaves a trail of imperfections. Indeed, the next great documentation to be born out of the Declaration of Independence, namely the US Constitution, had until 1865, a clause which stated that a slave, was three-fifths of a man. Moreover in a juxtaposition of sorts Thomas Jefferson, an avowed abolitionist, was himself a slave owner. In addition, the original draft listed the commerce of slavery as one of the violations that justify a break from England. The passage was stripped from the final version at the demand of the southern states, who would not vote for independence otherwise.

Some of my most favourite passages are reproduced below:

"...When in the course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation..."

"...We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness..."

I find it particularly interesting that in this declaration, the drafters have inserted a clause which allows, nay commands the people to fight for their rights. I believe the citizens of the United States of America are incredibly powerful in knowing that in theory, they can overthrow their government, should it diverge significantly from these principles, or take a stand that is not synonymous with the concept and idea of democracy.

However, my question still remains: Is the nation, notwithstanding the election of the President of the United States of America, still living upto the ideas of its forefathers?

God bless the United States of America.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Would you say, that the quest to surmout and stay atop the 'plateau of ideal' is quite an ardous task?

I am not sure they intended to be so far sighted. Evolution is supposed to be slow right, so many good ideas put forth by minds from eons back still have a way to go before fullilment. Just take the Greek Cardinal virtues for example...

By the way, you check out the
Open Society Institute thing?

Anonymous said...

oohh..

Anonymous said...

why oohh?

Anonymous said...

Hey Man, check this out:
By Thomas Macaulay on May 23, 1857:

Democracy (Whose average age is 200 years according to him) goes from...

From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage.

I know what's wrong with America: 40% of the current congress (111th) is controlled by the GOP. Which is a minority but still strong enough to distort public opinion. And the fact that FOX news is allowed on air doesn't make it any easier. They believe in crap ideals such as government intervention ("dependency")being a form of communism and will stop at nothing to fight it. But really their true intentions are to keep the CEOs, other top executives and basically every fat cat in America happy so that they continue to feed off their money.

They call themselves 'conservative' but they are really obstructionist and their only motive is to oppose everything the democrats suggest, by living in Australia we know for sure that (responsible) expenditure is what will get us out of this mess, sure it will increase debt but it is a lesser of two evils. Being simply obstructionist is one possibility. My other theory is that they are fully aware of a (reasonable) stimulus package's effectiveness but their reluctance to support a solution such as this is because it might be seen as an act of betrayal by their supporters (the fat cats), who may not prefer a reduction of the gap between the haves and have nots.

Here's what Michael Steele (the leader of the GOP) said about the stimulus act: "I think if the government were to get out of the way and let the small business community and corporations of America weed themselves through this process, it's survival of the fittest".
Survival of the fittest!? Yea, so apparently it's alright for "unfit" businesses to go under while their "unfit" employees suffer reduced healthcare, education and other nation building projects while the government "get's out of the way". I have nothing against Michael Steele I think he has a conscience unlike his colleagues, however its his colleagues themselves I'm worried about.

If those Neocon scumbags got their way, America (and the rest of world by virtue of their neoconservative endeavors) will become a place where the rich minority ruled the poor majority, the sick would have no public ammenities and no choice but to work in order to survive, intolerance will be on the rise, homo and bi-sexuals will be shot by oil rich gun wielding rednecks (or relatives of the Bush family who will openly welcome the eradication of gun laws) and the media will be the only government controlled body (for the "protection" of national security, which is the biggest oxymoron I've ever heard of).

Anonymous said...

if the democrats are 60% isn't there a bit of a 'good' news story as well brewing by the side?

If people like thomas macaulay are around and have been around and this sort of wisdom sort of hangs around, then there's already a bit of safety net right there?

Just this last post seems a bit pessimistic.

Aditya Rao said...

Well written & articulate